Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Home Print this page Email this page
Users Online:: 189

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 109-115

Outpatient prescribing and antibiotic use for children in a tertiary hospital


1 Department of Paediatrics, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria
3 Department of Paediatrics, Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria
4 Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria

Date of Submission24-May-2018
Date of Decision16-Jul-2018
Date of Acceptance02-Nov-2018
Date of Web Publication10-Jul-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Lawal Waisu Umar
Department of Paediatrics, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/smj.smj_27_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Rational prescribing is essential to prevent medication errors, antibiotic resistance, and treatment failure. Assessment of prescribing practices helps monitor the utilization of medicines. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prescribing pattern and utilization of antibiotics for children attending outpatient units. Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive, retrospective study of outpatient pediatric prescriptions received at the pharmacy of a Nigerian teaching hospital, using the World Health Organization (WHO) core prescribing indicators and Index of Rational Drug Prescribing (IRDP). Prescription information for a 2-year period was collected on a standardized prescribing form. Computer data entry was made into Microsoft Excel 2010 spreadsheet. Data analysis was done using SPSS Version 20(IBM, Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results were compared with the WHO core prescribing indicators and presented as means, frequencies, proportions, contingency tables, and charts comparing with published standards. Results: There were 3445 eligible prescriptions, with mean child age of 3.2 (±2.9) years. An average of 2.4 (±1.6) drugs were prescribed per encounter, with 48.2% written in generic names. Prescriptions containing oral antibiotics and antibiotic injections constituted 50.2% and 41.2%, respectively. Medicines prescribed were available in the essential medicines list in 95.5% of cases. The IRDP was 2.98 against the ideal of 5. Majority (71.3%) of antibiotic-containing prescriptions had one antibiotic prescribed while β-lactam penicillins and cephalosporins were the most prescribed, with ampicillin/cloxacillin being the most common combination. Conclusion: Irrational prescribing and inappropriate antibiotic use were prevalent in this tertiary hospital. Similar studies are needed to describe the trends in all Nigerian tertiary hospitals, along with retraining on rational prescribing.

Keywords: Antibiotics, children, essential medicines, outpatient, rational prescribing, tertiary hospital


How to cite this article:
Umar LW, Isah A, Musa S, Umar B. Outpatient prescribing and antibiotic use for children in a tertiary hospital. Sahel Med J 2020;23:109-15

How to cite this URL:
Umar LW, Isah A, Musa S, Umar B. Outpatient prescribing and antibiotic use for children in a tertiary hospital. Sahel Med J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 13];23:109-15. Available from: http://www.smjonline.org/text.asp?2020/23/2/109/289348




  Introduction Top


The irrational use of medicines encompasses errors of polypharmacy, inappropriate use of antibiotics, overuse of injections, and prescribing contrary to clinical practice guidelines.[1],[2]The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the rational use of medicines as when “patients receive medications appropriate to their clinical needs, in doses that meet their own individual requirements, for an adequate period of time, and at the lowest cost to them and their community”.[1],[2] Although a worldwide problem, the prevalence of irrational drug use is higher in developing countries where infectious disease burden is higher, with limited choices of antibiotics and other drugs, and further worsened by poor regulation of the use of medicines.[3] Prescribing for children poses daunting challenges because medication dosages are most often weight-based and require meticulous calculations.[4] Wrong prescribing is among the most common types of medication errors in pediatric prescriptions.[4],[5] A systematic review of literature has revealed an incidence of dosing errors up to 500,000/year in pediatric prescriptions in the UK.[6]

The consequences of irrational use of medicines may be more in children, especially as studies have revealed that younger children receive more prescriptions with the highest rates observed in preschoolers and infants.[7] Such consequences include adverse effects, poor treatment outcome due to the development of antibiotic resistance, increase in health-care costs for families, and increased burden on National Health Systems.[8],[9],[10] The irrational use of parenteral medication is also common and the WHO estimates suggest that up to 16 billion injections are prescribed annually worldwide, with over 70% being unnecessary and with the risk of transmission of bloodborne infections.[11]

The WHO has developed quantitative indicators that measure the prescribing practices of health-care providers, which are adopted as global standards to assess for rational drug use and level of implementation of antimicrobial stewardship.[12] The WHO prescribing indicators and the Index of Rational Drug Prescribing (IRDP) represent minimal standards for rational drug use for monitoring and problem identification.[12],[13],[14],[15]

To facilitate the rational use of medicines, the WHO has been advocating the concept of essential medicines over the last three decades and has developed policies to promote the quality use of medicines (QUM).[16] The analysis of data on ten validated QUM indicators obtained from the WHO databases for 56 low- and middle-income countries for 2002–2008 revealed that 27 out of 38 WHO recommendations on essential medicine policies were associated with improved QUM.[16] Figures for Nigeria indicated a 53.5% rate of prescribing of antibiotics, 86.8% of prescribed medicines present in the essential medicines list (EML), 41.8% rate of prescribing with generic names, and 10.95% rate of prescribing with injectable drug.[16]

The major determinants of prescribing practices include influences of mentors and that of pharmaceutical sales representatives as well as peculiarities that differ between patients.[17],[18],[19] For instance, Ljungberg et al.,[17] De Souza et al.,[18] and Oshikoya et al.[19] have found that postgraduate trainees in teaching hospitals exhibited prescribing habits suggestive of immediate influence of more senior physicians and peer colleagues, respectively, whom they tended to emulate in a didactic routine.[17],[18],[19] Other studies in developing countries using the WHO indicators on outpatient pediatric populations have shown a general trend toward irrational drug use. Such reports from Nigeria identified irrational use of antibiotics, polypharmacy, nonadherence to generic prescribing, and high use of injections.[20],[21] In Sierra Leone, Cole et al.[22] reported an average of 3.77 drugs/prescription, 71% written with generic names, 74.8% had antibiotics, 21.1% had injections, and 70.6% available in the EML, with an IRDP of 2.71. In India, Sharma and Shweta [23] found 75.1% of pediatric medicines available in the EML, an average of 1.9 drugs/encounter, 60.2% written with generic names, with 25.7% and 4.1% of encounters containing antibiotics and injections, respectively.

There is a paucity of reports from Nigerian tertiary hospitals on pediatric outpatient prescribing based on the WHO core prescribing indicators and the IRDP. A literature search (Google Scholar, MEDLINE, HINARI, and Africa Journals Online) using appropriate search terms revealed only two such studies in Nigeria,[20],[21] none of which included derivation of IRDP. We, therefore, aimed to investigate pediatric outpatient prescriptions in our hospital using the WHO standard prescribing indicators and to determine the IRDP.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study center

The Ahmadu Bello University Teaching hospital is an 800-bed capacity referral facility in Northern Nigeria. Children are attended to as outpatients at the general outpatient department, the accidents/emergency unit, and the pediatric subspecialty clinics, as well as from the inpatient units (emergency, neonatal, medical, and surgical wards). No antibiotic stewardship program or such other drug monitoring activity was ever implemented in the hospital before the study period.

Study design

This was a descriptive retrospective observational study involving outpatient prescriptions issued at all the children's units and received at the hospital pharmacy between January 2013 and December 2014.

Study data source

All prescriptions for children under the age of 18 years received at the hospital pharmacy within the stipulated period constituted the study sample.

Inclusion criteria

All child outpatient prescriptions received and considered readable (legibly written), containing one or more drugs, with client hospital number, age, and address of origin of prescription were included in the study. This approach was adopted to get uniform spread over the study period and to minimize bias from seasonal variations in illness presentations and interruptions of drug supply cycles.[12]

Exclusion criteria

Prescription orders containing only consumable items, intravenous infusions, and vaccines and those without hospital number, age, and address of origin of prescription were excluded from the study. Furthermore, excluded were prescriptions that were unreadable or belonged to patients that were on admission.

Data collection

Eligible prescriptions retrieved from the central records section of the pharmacy were compiled together. Three intern pharmacists trained for the purpose of the research, checked prescription forms for compliance with standard prescription writing format including age, sex, hospital number, weight, prescriber's name and signature and extracted the relevant data. Information obtained on medicines included name, dose, route, strength, frequency, dosage form and instructions for use, number of drugs prescribed, and duration of treatment. Antibiotic dosages were assessed by comparison with doses available in the 2010/2011 British National Formulary for Children and the Emdex Pediatric Drug Guide 2013 edition used in Nigeria.[24],[25] The prescription forms were independently assessed by each of the interns, and the data obtained from each patient encounter were entered into a standardized prescribing indicator form adapted from the WHO prescribing indicators form. The three entries were crosschecked for consistency and interobserver concordance.

Data analysis

The WHO core prescribing indicators were used to evaluate prescriptions.[12] The IRDP, which further reveals the extent to which prescriptions met the ideal standard of rational drug use, was derived from the WHO core indicators. A validated method of indexing,[13] also used by Cole et al.,[22] consisting of five scores derived from the WHO prescribing indicators was used. The ideal or optimal level for each indicator [Table 1][14],[15],[21],[22] allots each of the WHO indicators an optimal index score of one, such that calculated indices closer to one were considered as more rational prescribing.[14],[15],[21] This validated method of indexing was used to calculate the indices for polypharmacy, generic name use in prescribing, EML use, rational antibiotic prescribing, and injectable medication use.[14],[15],[21] The IRDP, which has an optimal maximum value of 5 as shown in [Table 1], was then calculated by adding the five corresponding indices obtained from the results.
Table 1: Optimal scores of prescribing indicators

Click here to view


Data analysis

Data collected was entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and transferred into SPSS Version 20 (IBM, Corp., Armonk, NY), which was used for the analysis. Results were compared with the core WHO prescribing indicators and presented as means, frequencies and proportions, contingency tables, and charts.

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval was obtained from Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital Zaria Health Research Ethics Committee on 3rd January 2012. All research procedures complied with 2013 declaration of Geneva declaration.


  Results Top


Demographic characteristics

Out of 3768 prescription orders obtained, 3445 considered eligible were analyzed. Prescriptions for children aged up to 5 years (31.8%) combined with those for infants (28.1%) formed the majority, with a mean age of 3.2 years. There were more male (56.3%) than female [Table 2], with a male: female ratio of 1.3:1.
Table 2: Demographic characteristics of children with eligible prescriptions

Click here to view


Prescription writing formats

Majority (93%) of the prescriptions had complete patient biodata written, while 45.6% and 87.1% had name and signature of the prescriber, respectively [Figure 1]. Furthermore, whereas majority (84.2%) had optimum dosages of antibiotics [Figure 1], 15.6% of the prescribed antibiotics were outside the range of recommended doses.
Figure 1: Pattern of prescribing for children observed among eligible prescription orders

Click here to view


While the mean number of drugs per prescription was 2.4, most prescriptions had one (29.6%) or two (26.2%) drugs and the proportion of prescriptions with 4 or ≥5 drugs were 13.4% and 7.8%, respectively [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Percentages of number of drugs contained in prescription orders

Click here to view


Core prescribing indicators

The average number of drugs prescribed per encounter was 2.4, while the median was 2.0. A total of 1729 (50.2%) of prescription orders contained one or more antibiotics, while prescriptions written with generic names constituted 48.2%, with 41.2% having one or more injections. Majority (95.5%) of drugs contained in the prescription orders were available in the facility's EML. The prescribing indicators obtained varied widely from previously derived values obtained from studies in Nigeria [26] and with the WHO standards [26] [Table 3].
Table 3: The World Health Organization core prescribing indicators assessed for drug prescriptions

Click here to view


Index of Rational Drug Prescribing

The cumulative IRDP as obtained from the component indices in this study was 2.98, compared to the recommended ideal of 5. The corresponding indices for prescriptions containing injections and use of the generic name in prescribing were 0.15 and 0.48, respectively, while EML index had a score of 0.96 [Table 4].
Table 4: Calculated indices of rational drug prescribing

Click here to view


Antibiotics contained in prescription orders

Whereas majority of prescriptions had a single antibiotic (71.3%), only 2.9% and 0.8% had three or more antibiotics, respectively, as shown in

[Figure 3].
Figure 3: Percentage frequency of number of antibiotics written per prescription order

Click here to view


The most frequent classes of antibiotics prescribed were β-lactams (27.2%), cephalosporins (21.9%), and imidazoles (15.3%) as shown in [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Percentage frequency of appearance of individual antibiotics among prescriptions

Click here to view


The major combinations of antibiotics prescribed include ampicillin/cloxacillin (47.0%), amoxicillin/metronidazole (11.9%), and ampicillin/cloxacillin/gentamicin (7.5%) [Table 5].
Table 5: Most frequent antibiotic combinations prescribed

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


This study found a predominance of prescriptions among the groups of infants and preschoolers, with a male preponderance (male: female ratio of 1.3:1). This is probably reflective of the younger child's vulnerability to illnesses on a background of a naïve immune system, prompting more frequent hospital presentations. With similar findings reported in other studies,[20],[21],[22],[23],[27],[28] this depicts the higher chances for inappropriate prescribing for younger children exposing them to risks of adverse effects.

Compliance with standard prescribing format was inadequate as evidenced by suboptimal proportions of prescriptions with complete prescriber identity, poor use of generic names, incomplete patient biodata, and inappropriate dosages. Such observations have been reported in similar studies at other Nigerian tertiary hospitals.[20],[21],[27],[28] This poor compliance underscores a need for the conduct of similar studies in other tertiary hospitals nationwide to understand the true extent of the problem of irrational medicines use for children that attend these facilities.

Even with an average of 2.4 drugs per prescription, there was a high rate of polypharmacy, with over one-fifth of prescriptions containing four or more drugs. A similar study in Gambia that found an average of 2.2 drugs per prescription, however, reported 64.3% of prescriptions containing at least one antibiotic,[29] in contrast to our finding of 50.2% of prescriptions with antibiotics. It has been established that the risks associated with polypharmacy and use of brand names could include adverse drug reactions and increased financial costs for families.[2],[27],[28],[29]

Whereas the higher proportion of prescriptions with antibiotics above the standard of <30%[14],[15],[21] did not differ much from a previously documented rate for Nigeria,[16] the index of rational antibiotic prescribing of 0.6 is below the recommended standard of 1.0.[21] Similar findings were also reported in studies from some other parts of Nigeria,[20],[21],[27],[28] suggesting a trend for antibiotic overuse for children in Nigerian tertiary hospitals. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for pediatric outpatients has also been reported in tertiary hospitals in other African countries.[22],[30] Well-documented drivers of inappropriate antibiotic use include influences of prescribing habits of mentors, trainers and pharmaceutical sales representatives, lack of treatment guidelines/protocols, and diagnostic facilities, as well as clients' (caregivers') demand for specific drugs.[1],[2],[9],[18],[19] Whereas this study did not obtain data from patient case notes on clinical or microbiologic diagnoses, the results obtained are enough cause for concern. Although we did not examine the identity of prescribers, it could further be inferred that being a training center, the anticipated transfer of appropriate prescribing skills is rather inadequate and perhaps the influence of trainers with suboptimal skills on the prescribing habits of trainees cannot be ruled out.

A quarter of the prescriptions contained two antibiotics and <4% contained three or more antibiotics, suggestive of a high rate of combination therapy, supposedly to broaden the spectrum of antibacterial effect. Although alternative single agents with broad enough spectrum of activity exist on the EML, the consideration for their cost in preference for cheaper antibiotics may have influenced the choice for the combinations. This could explain the finding of oral β-lactam penicillins as the most common class from which the prescriptions were made. However, this study has as a limitation of being retrospective and lacked data on indications for antibiotic use, which could have given better insight into rationality in decision for antibiotic choices.

The core prescribing indicators obtained were at par with previously derived values in Nigeria and other resource-limited countries, but were at great variance with the WHO standards,[12] except for drugs present in the EML. The IRDP obtained (2.98), was similarly lower than the ideal of 5.0, further affirming the prevailing irrational prescribing. In comparison with other few published studies from tertiary hospitals in developing countries, the IRDP found in this report came close to that reported in Sierra Leone, with an IRDP of 2.71.[22] In Pakistan, the IRDP of 3.70 and 3.44 was obtained in a study comparing pediatric outpatient prescriptions in two tertiary hospitals.[31] The low IRDP in our report has potentially far-reaching implications considering the status of the facility as a federal teaching hospital from where trainees would graduate to subsequently assume the role of prescribers in other parts of the country. The WHO has identified university teaching hospitals as resource providers with responsibility for improving the training of health workers in general and on rational medicines use in particular.[1],[12] These facilities also have the responsibility of serving as reviewers and implementers of training curricula, incorporating concepts such as those of essential medicines in training, continuing education, and service guidelines.[1],[12] To adequately discharge these responsibilities, there is a need for periodic curriculum content review and reorientation for all categories of prescribers, especially those involved in training at various levels in tertiary facilities across Nigeria.

Our study provides background information of prescribing pattern for outpatient children managed at a teaching hospital, which could be used for objective comparison with results of assessments in future, aimed to monitor and to evaluate prescribing practices. The limitations of this study include the fact that the WHO prescribing indicators, we used to assess only the quantitative aspect of drug use and do not determine qualitative issues of accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of drug choices. For a more complete assessment of the rational use of medicines, other important parameters, such as patient care and facility indicators, are needed; however, these were not included in this study whose objective was to assess prescribing pattern. Nevertheless, the study provides baseline information to compare with future studies to evaluate the impact of interventions.


  Conclusion and Recommendations Top


We found the evidence of inappropriate prescribing practices, whose potential implications may include the transmission of similar practices to medical trainees at various levels, as a function of mentorship and tutelage by senior medical staff. The findings highlight a need for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship activity for the hospital. We recommend evidence-based reorientation trainings on the rational use of medicines for all cadres of physicians in teaching hospitals along with curriculum review to include comprehensive instruction on the same subject for undergraduate training.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
World Health Organization, 1987. Conference of Experts on the Rational Use of Drugs. Nairobi, Kenya, Geneva: World Health Organization; 25-29 November, 1985. Available from: http://www.apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js17054e/. [Last accessed on 2017 Feb 12].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. Promoting Rational Use of Medicines: Core Components – WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines. World Health Organization; 2002. Available from: http://www.appswho.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Jh3011e/. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 18].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Blum NL. Drug Information Development. Case Study Nepal. Rational Pharmaceutical Management Project. United States Pharmacopoeia; 2000. Available from: http://www.usp.org/pdf/EN/dqi/nepalCaseStudy.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Feb 12].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kaushal R, Bates DW, Landrigan C, McKenna KJ, Clapp MD, Federico F, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA 2001;285:2114-20.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Simpson JH, Lynch R, Grant J, Alroomi L. Reducing medication errors in the neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F480-2.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wong IC, Ghaleb MA, Franklin BD, Barber N. Incidence and nature of dosing errors in paediatric medications: A systematic review. Drug Saf 2004;27:661-70.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Piovani D, Clavenna A, Cartabia M, Bonati M; Interregional Italian Drug Utilisation Group. Antibiotic and anti-asthmatic drug prescriptions in Italy: Geographic patterns and socio-economic determinants at the district level. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2014;70:331-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nicolas A, Eickhoff C, Griese N, Schulz M. Drug-related problems in prescribed medicines in Germany at the time of dispensing. Int J Clin Pharm 2013;35:476-82.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hashemi S, Nasrollah A, Rajabi M. Irrational antibiotic prescribing: A local issue or global concern? EXCLI J 2013;12:384-95.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
World Health Organization. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/112642/9789241564748_eng.pdf?sequence=. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr 19].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
World Health Organization. WHO Injection Safety Fact Sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs231/en/. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr 19].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
World Health Organization. How to Investigate Drug Use in Health Facilities: Selected Drug Use Indicators – EDM Research Series No 007. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993. Available from: http://www.apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/s2289e/s2289e.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Feb 17].  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Zhang Y, Zhi M. Index system, appraising method for comprehensive appraisal. J North Jiaotong Univ 1995;19:393-400.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
De Joncheere K. Implementation of rational pharmacotherapy. Meeting under Danish EU presidency. Perspectives and Achievements with Rational Pharmacotherapy. Copenhagen Denmark: WHO/EURO; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Melander A. Variation in drug utilization in the EU: Causes and consequences as illustrated by antibiotics. Meeting under Danish EU presidency. Perspectives and Achievements with Rational Pharmacotherapy. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO/EURO; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Holloway KA, Henry D. WHO essential medicines policies and use in developing and transitional countries: An analysis of reported policy implementation and medicines use surveys. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001724.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ljungberg C, Lindblad AK, Tully MP. Hospital doctors' views of factors influencing their prescribing. J Eval Clin Pract 2007;13:765-71.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
De Souza V, MacFarlane A, Murphy AW, Hanahoe B, Barber A, Cormican M, et al. A qualitative study of factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing by non-consultant hospital doctors. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58:840-3.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Oshikoya KA, Oreagba I, Adeyemi O. Sources of drug information and their influence on the prescribing behaviour of doctors in a teaching hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J 2011;9:13.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Nduka SO, Edebeatu C, Isidienu CP, Amorha KC. Prescribing practices for pediatric out-patients: A case study of two teaching hospitals in Nigeria. Trop J Pharm Res 2017;16:705-11.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Oshikoya KA, Chukwura HA, Ojo OI. Evaluation of outpatient paediatric drug prescriptions in a teaching hospital in Nigeria for rational prescribing. Paediatr Perinat Drug Ther 2006;7:183-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Cole CP, James PB, Kargbo AT. An evaluation of the prescribing patterns for under-five patients at a tertiary paediatric hospital in Sierra Leone. J Basic Clin Pharm 2015;6:109-14.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Sharma A, Shweta O. Assessment of drug prescription pattern in children: A descriptive study. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2016;6:74-80.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
British Medical Association, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacists Group. British National Formulary for children 2010-2011 edition. UK: BMJ Publishing Group; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Obi CC. Anti-infective Drugs. In: Emdex Paediatric Drug Guide (Based on WHO Model list of Essential Medicines for Children). Mississauga Canada: Chris Five Consulting Inc.; 2013. p. 313-90.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Hogerzeil HV, Bimo, Ross-Degnan D, Laing RO, Ofori-Adjei D, Santoso B, et al. Field tests for rational drug use in twelve developing countries. Lancet 1993;342:1408-10.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Anyanwu N, Arigbe-osula M. Pattern of antibiotic use in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2012;19:195.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Nwolisa CE, Erinaugha EU, Ofoleta SI. Prescribing practices of doctors attending to under fives in a children's outpatient clinic in Owerri, Nigeria. J Trop Pediatr 2006;52:197-200.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Risk R, Naismith H, Burnett A, Moore SE, Cham M, Unger S, et al. Rational prescribing in paediatrics in a resource-limited setting. Arch Dis Child 2013;98:503-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Desalegn AA. Assessment of drug use pattern using WHO prescribing indicators at Hawassa University teaching and referral hospital, South Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:170.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Atif M, Sarwar MR, Azeem M, Umer D, Rauf A, Rasool A, et al. Assessment of WHO/INRUD core drug use indicators in two tertiary care hospitals of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan. J Pharm Policy Pract 2016;9:27.  Back to cited text no. 31
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
   Conclusion and R...
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed105    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded30    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]